|
Globalism 2011 |
![]() |
|
|||||
|
National Journal: First published 01/01/2012 |
|
The Lunatics of Berlin Greg Lippman calls the BRD Political clique "Idiots" - they make laws with which they seal their own downfall.
Of those who are swanning around the German Parliament these days many Germans are actually trying to define them collectively as "political-human scum". Yes, some have woken up and are aware that the polit-Mafia in the Bundestag is actually consenting to the ruination of the German people. Perhaps they could be excused of not even understanding to what they nod in approval. But then they better vote against it, or else they are guilty of being accomplices to the German genocide. "The debt of countries is social genocide," said Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, The Nobel Peace Prize Winner 1980. Should a change occur on German soil, these people might be shot or beheaded, as the internationally respected financial expert Max Keiser was advocating in an interview. When these Yes-men agree to the new destruction-laws under the disguise of the so called "Euro-salvage" program they are indeed what many call them already far and wide: "stompers on the nation". They, without suffering any hardship are on the side of the enemy, only to safeguard their lurks and perks, as Max Keiser expressed it: "Siding with the enemy is, of course, treason and is attracting the death penalty." The title of the new laws alone clearly indicate that the head nodders are not meant to know what they vote for: "Law for the change of the law for the take-over of warrants within the framework of a European stabilizing mechanism." Of course the Lippman-ish idiot dares not ask what is meant by this. After all it is intimated that only idiots do not know what is meant here. When one system's newspaper like Die Welt writes, that the Lippman idiots are deliberately hoodwinked by the parliament, the we know what hour has come upon us. "The main problem is that many members of parliament, who will decide about these regulations, with certainty will not understand important details and the consequences implied. Important regulations are deliberately vague or obviously intended to be formulated in a complicated manner. One could gain the impression that the German government wishes to prevent the parties from asking critical questions about details. While the legal subtleties of this bill are essential to know. On the one hand the EFSF is the precursor for the salvaging umbrella ESM, that will come into force by 2013 - and that forever. With this law, on the other hand, the German Government promises the other Euro-zone countries as much money for their stabilising efforts. Everyone ought to know what they raise their hands for. The consequences for Germany's financial situation and that of its citizens could be devastating, when even their representatives don't understand the importance of their vote. This seems to exactly be the case, considering the intricate wording of the law's wording. For many technical terms, such as 'Society of convenience', 'Recapitalisation', 'Primary Market' or 'Secondary Market', will be foreign words, whose meaning requires consulting a dictionary of finance. And many will after these readings, not be able to understand what cycles will be set into circulation, when this law is being applied." (Die Welt, 01.09.2011, p. 10) Let us not deceive ourselves, the main harpy of the lobby, Mrs Merkel, does not understand a word of it either. Not even her finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble, who looks more like Satan's twin every day, has any idea what will happen to the Germans. Both are being briefed before passing such Legislation-Crimes, by their Lobby commanding officers, who order them without any ado: "This law has to pass".
Incidentally, for exactly this situation the criminal anti-German guard of the Greens has been groomed. The mindless voters have been whipped to a frenzy of fear with the Fukushima-hysteria, until the house trained the voting herd to consider only one option in the election: To vote for the political criminal guard of the Greens. It is comprehensible when the Banksters like Greg Lippman and Richard Fuld speak of the Germans as "dumb idiots"? The Greens and the SPD demand with hysterical intensity, to bless these socialist genocidal anti-German laws. In case some CDU parliamentarians, overcome by conscience, withhold their agreement, the Greens and the SPD certainly are. The Liberal Democrats (FDP) subscribe to any outrageous junk in the hope to be more popular in the eyes of the lobby, after the gay foreign minister is merciless being whipped every day for his attitude toward Libya. We at NJ have indicated several times that new demands running into the billions of Euros are made by powerful Jewish organisations going back to the Weimar Republik. Of course all these liabilities were settled with the "London Debt Agreement" of 27th February 1953. But all that is of no interest for the Capital Offernders. The first court cases in the US have already been won and and the demands for Billions are coming toward the Germans. As a start a so-called loan- package to the then value of 208 Million Dollars is asserted. Including the interest, within the framework of an out of court comparison Germany as a "good European simpleton" will have to fork out in the likes of 500 Billion Euros. Take note, this is only a beginning: "Further demands are in the wings." (Welt, 13.08.2010, p. 15) Since the new burden of the "Weimar-investment Fraud" is taking shape, all those who in the Bild Zeitung are labeled as "Simpletons" and "idiots" according to Mrs Merkel and the Banksters, under the guise of salvaging banks, aid for the financial crisis and EU savings umbrella contracts with guarantees in the Billions of Euros entered into by the FRG, ought to imagine how that might impact the future 1000 generations of Germans. The "Weimar Fraud" will be multiplied a billion-fold. The yes-men in the Bundestag who agree with the genocidal laws of the banksters without suffering hardship, are putting their life on the line when legal practices based on the rule of law are re-established. Max Keiser is right. |