| site search by freefind | advanced search |
| Jewish Studies 2011 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
National Journal: First published 07/11/2011 |
|
Netanyahu advocates the Wannsee lie before the United Nations
The Document forger Benjamin Netanyahu feels at home at the United Nations. It was here where he made false accusations of alleged Holocaust crimes against the former Austrian president Kurt Waldheim. "The fraudulent documents were ‘coincidentally discovered' at the UN by the Israeli Ambassador Benjamin Netanyahu. This was part of a defamation campaign against Waldheim, who was critical of the Israeli intervention in southern Lebanon." (Former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky in his book "Mossad Secret Files". Bertelsmann Publishers, Munich 1994, p. 291) On September 23rd 2009, the Israeli Prime Minister used the lectern of the United Nations once again. This time to spread abroad the Wannsee-Lie. The Israeli document trickster saw himself forced into a position to counter the Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, who had declared only five days earlier, on the 18th September 2009 in an international Television broadcast: "The Holocaust was the excuse for the establishment of the state of Israel. A lie, based on nothing else but unfounded assertions." (ZDF-Heute, German TV, 18 Sep 2009) Netanyahu held up a document before the assembly of the members of the UN, which he claimed to be the so-called "Wannsee Protocol", which supposedly contained the government's decision for the ''extermination of Jews''. The "Holocaust decision" on the document held up was said to have been decided upon in connection with a meeting in a house on the Wannsee (lake Wann) in Berlin on January 20th 1942. "Then Netanyahu again showed the camera the copy of the protocols of the Wannsee Conference 1942, according to which the Nazis planned the Holocaust. ‘Is this a lie?’ Netanyahu asked once again” (spiegel.de, 24.9.2009) Nobody had the gumption to get up and call out to the Holocaust fraudster: "Yes, Mr. Netanyahu, it is a lie". The truth is that the meeting in the Wannsee Villa in 1942 was nothing else, but an in-official ministerial gathering and not a conference to decide upon the extermination of the Jews. It was the custom that the higher echelon of the ministries in Berlin met once a month in informal gatherings to discuss issues. In the year 1942 the Wannsee Villa was chosen for possibly the simple reason to avoid any interruptions from the frequent bombing alarms in the city. At this meeting there were only 15 members present from various ministries in Berlin and not all of them members of the Nazi Party. The leadership of the discussion was given to SS-Gruppenführer (major general of the SS) Reinhard Heydrich who explained that Hitler had delegated the settlement of the Jewish question to him. It was never mentioned that there was a "Jewish solution" in the sense of a plan of extermination of all Jewry, but rather the original Madagascar plan, whereby the Jews were to develop their own government, which evidently became an impossibility due to developments in the war. Furthermore, there would be territory made available in the East for the Jews, where they could establish their own state. These resettlement plan, not extermination plan, was confirmed by the Holocaust professor Yehuda Bauer: "And all this converged in the decisive demand of Hitler to resettle the Jews in the framework of an international agreement". (Yehuda Bauer, Ransoming the Jews?, Jüdischer Verlag, Frankfurt 1996, p. 62) Besides that, this Holocaust professor toured the world during his lifetime giving lectures. The assertion that at the Wannsee conference decided upon the extermination of the Jews, was declared to be nothing but a "silly tale" and this criticism was endlessly repeated: "An Israeli Holocaust scholar has de-bunked the Wannsee Conference, at which top Nazi officials are said to have gathered at a villa in a Berlin suburb in 1942 to draw the blueprints of the ‘Final Solution’ ... According to Prof. Yehuda Bauer of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Wannsee was a meeting, ‘but hardly a conference’, and ‘little of what was said there was executed in detail. … The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that extermination of the Jews was arrived at in Wannsee ’." (The Canadian Jewish News, 30 Jan 1992, p. 8) After the Jewish Holocaust professor effectively cleared the way to declare that the Wannsee story was nothing but a "silly story" at the beginning of 1992 even the Bundesrepublik, born out the of Holo-story fell into step with Yehuda Bauer. The BRD parliament itself, or more precisely, the house newspaper "Das Parlament" as the voice of the parliament, established once and for all, that nothing had been planned Villa that could be connected with a story of the "extermination of the Jews at the Wannsee." "An unbiased study of the minutes (of the Wannsee-Conference) establishes that those who met there had not concluded anything that could be evaluated as an intellectual, or ordered, initiation of the crime. Unfortunately historical science was not able to satisfy the need for a precise picture regarding the Wannsee matter, its representatives were unable to produce a logical alternative to the false Wannsee image. ... Eventually it seems that they have at least successfully shattered the popular erroneous picture [that the extermination of the Jews was mapped out at Wannsee]. However, altered versions, still quite remote from the truth, of this image could recently be found in the press again, stating that on January 20, 1942, the participants of the Wannsee-Conference had concluded 'coordinating measures for the murder of 11 million Jews from European countries'.". (Politics and Contemporary History (supplement of "Das Parlament", the official German parliament magazine) B 1-2/92 - Jan. 3, 1992, page 18) Already in 1993 Roland Bohlinger, a German holocaust researcher, received documents that ‘prove’ that different versions of the "Wannsee-protocols" exist. It appears that the Jewish prosecutor, Robert M. W. Kempner, deputy to the chief prosecutor Robert H. Jackson of the Nuremberg Tribunal had ordered these document frauds to be produced at Nürnberg to indict the accused Germans. The Germans on the other hand were not permitted at the victor's Tribunal to defend themselves against such accusations. Every accusation had to be accepted as "Manifest Obviousness" or “Judicial Notice” according to the special legislation (usually referred to simply as the London Charter or Nuremberg Charter) of the victor’s Tribunal. Roland Bohlinger collated, together with Johannes Ney, an expert report, which was later published as well in Germar Rudolf’s book "Dissecting the Holocaust". According to this documentation the important official letterhead was missing on all of the various versions of the "Wannsee Protocol". Even though Eichmann was supposed to have been the instigator of the protocol, his high SS-office did not even own a typewriter with the SS-key! Especially obvious with the Kempners-Netanyahu counterfeit was the decoration with the Iron Cross 1st class, written E.K.1 in Arabic numeral and not E.K.I in Roman numeral, which was well known to the average German but evidently not to Eichmann’s office. These and many other incredible errors were dished up once again by Netanyahu on 23rd September 2009 before the representatives of the world’s nations in New York. When a documents falsifier like Netanyahu receives applause at the United Nations for his Wannsee-Lies and the truth is despised, then we can understand why the now murdered president, Muammar Gaddafi, called the UN organisation a "Terror council" on the self-same 23rd September 2009 and tore up the UN constitution before everyone’s eyes. "First Muammar al-Gaddafi insulted the UN security Council as a ‘Council of terror’ then he also tore up its Magna Charta. But in his homeland of Libya the leader of the revolution is celebrated for his aggressive behaviour." (Welt.de, 24.9.2009) |
