Not only Russian President Vladimir Puting foresaw that 911 would change the world: "Putin believes that America is going to wage war on global terrorism. A war that will reach far beyond the bombing of Afghan Talibans. It will be a war which is going to renew the face of the world." -- Die Welt, Nov 11, 2001. p. 7. "Daring observers see the contours of a totally new dawn of a world-domestic-policy, following on from the happenings in Afghanistan. The way to a world-domestic-policy seems to lead via a civil-world-war. A struggle between religions and cultures. A doubtful progress with consequences of which one would like to close his eyes." -- Die Welt, Nov 16, 2001, p. 33.  "Our global vision has now been challenged" was therefore Bush's reason for "war on terrorism". --Die Welt, Nov 7, 2001, p. 6.

America wants a world government, America wants "undivided power over the world", as the late French President, Francois Mitterand, put it. Even German Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, holds this opinion as he recently expressed at a meeting with his party faction. Such a world government needs to conquer the last resources of our world, such as Middle Eastern oilfields. Who would dare resist America's notion? "Islam represents the only remaining ideological power which is daring enough to oppose the plans of the 'Great Satan', the Jewish dominated Untied States." -- Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Sep 30, 2001, p. 11, quoted the National Journal. A "Jewish dominated America" is not a fantasy product of the National Journal, but a boasting statement by Israeli Prime-Minister Ariel Sharon: "We, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it." -- Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, WRMEA, 10 Oct 2001.

To start and wage the Great Cultural World War, a vast pretext and a plausible reason was reqired. It is quite common knowledge in the Islamic world, that intelligence services were behind 911: "Israel's Mossad could be behind the US attacks: Syrian paper." -- AFP, Sep 19, 2001.

We want to make some of the so-called conspiracy theories a subject of discussion and therefore we wish to bring them to our readers attention as follows:

What did America need more than anything, in order to intersperse its plans of a world crusade, carried by the rage and horror of its people?

"What's needed is a unified, unifying, Pearl Harbor sort of purple American fury -- a ruthless indignation that doesn't lead away in a week or two." --Time Magazine, September 11, 2001, Inside back cover.

Which were Israel's interests at that time? How could Israel have used America for its own ends? Was Bush to be punished, perhaps, for failures and to be used for Israel's benifit at the same time? And what are the Bush-Clan's interests in pursuing a world cultural war, started in the Middle East? General  Hamid Gul, the former director general of the Pakistani Intelligence Services ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence) and then a close Amerian ally, who worked hand in hand with the American CIA, verifies the struggle between the Bush clan and Jewry: "Jews never agreed to Bush 41 (George H.W. Bush, the 41st president) or 43 (his son George W. Bush, the 43rd president). They made sure Bush senior didn't get a second term. His land-for-peace pressure in Palestine didn't suit Israel. They were also against the young Bush because he was considered too close to oil interests and the Gulf countries. Bush senior and Jim Baker had raised $150 million for Bush junior, much of it from Mideast sources or their American go-betweens. Bush 41 and Baker, as private citizens, had also facilitated the new strategic relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran. I have this from sources in both countries. So clearly the prospect of a Bush 43 was a potential danger to Israel. Jews were stunned by the way Bush stole the election in Florida. They had put big money on Al Gore. [Mossad's materminded attack on America] has given Israel's imperialist guardian parent opportunities to turn disaster into a pretext for imposing an all-encompassing military, political and economic agenda to further the cause of global capitalism." --UPI Interview with General Gul, Sep. 26, 2001.

The attacks on the World Trade Center took place early in the morning, at a time when every one in New York was aware that only a relatively small number of people would arrive for work. Why did they not plan the attack for a time when more than 40.000 employees and thousands of tourists would have been inside the building? If the attackers were Islamic terrorists wouldn't they have chosen a time to achieve utmost casualties? Another curiosity factor was that "only" five Israelis died in both towers:

"Israel and 9/11"

The five Israeli victims of September 11: Alona Avraham, Leon Lebor, Shay Levinhar, Daniel Lewin, Haggai Sheffi.." --Ha'aretz, Israel, Dec 23, 2002)

Odigo, the New York branch of an Israeli firm, had been informed about the imminent attacks ahead of time. Thus, Jews were warned: "Odigo, the instant messaging service, says that two of its workers received messages two hours before the Twin Towers attack on September 11 predicting the attack would happen." --Ha’aretz, Israel, Dec 22, 2002.

No less exciting is the fact that five Israelis, that morning, went with video cameras near the towers. On a working day. These Israelis had video cameras on hand to record the disastrous event when they were supposed to be working. What premonitionery powers these Jews possess, being aware that something enormous would happen. It is especially remarkable as their business is not related in any sense to the photographic industry. In fact, they were in the removal business.

"Five Israelis who had worked for a moving company based in New Jersey are being held in U.S. prisons for what the Federal Bureau of Investigation has described as 'puzzling behavior' following the terror attack on the World Trade Center in New York last Tuesday. ... The five had worked for the company, which is owned by an Israeli ... the FBI had arrested the five for 'puzzling behavior'. They are said to have had been caught videotaping the disaster and shouting in what was interpreted as 'cries of joy and mockery'."< -- Ha'aretz, Israel, Sep 17, 2001.

Israel has its own agenda on how the entire Middle East should be arranged. However, the leaders of the Jewish state also know that their ideas, of how the Middle East should be shaped, cannot be achieved peacefully. In the shadow of a destructive war, the problems with the Palestinians could be resolved and Erez Israel (Greater Israel) could be implemented. Israel would feel safer when all her alleged enemies have been defeated:

Former Israeli Prime-Minister Ehud Barak said in an interview:  "The whole world has now to start a world war against the enemies of Israel." --Le Monde, Sep. 13, 2001.

Could a few people, not even capable of flying small single engine planes, have skillfully flown large sophisticated passenger jets precisely into such targets? Could such an undertaking be concealed from CIA and Mossad?

"After all, this was no random attack but one that must have needed months of planning. If, as seemed likely, it did originate somewhere in the Middle East, many people there and the US must have taken part in the preparations. " -- The Independent, London, Sep 12, 2001, p. 3)

Now, in the middle of the struggle against international terrorism, so-called Islamic terrorists are standing trial in Germany also. Lawyers of the accused, discovered that their clients were lead by agents of secret services:

"The entire project regarding the foiled bombing attack of premises in Strasburg had been planned under the control of intelligence services, said lawyer Reiner Koch on Tuesday before the provincial high court Frankfurt. ... At least two members of this Islamic group, not standing trial in Frankfurt, were active agents of secret services." --Die Welt, Feb 26, 2003, p. 5.

"Mohamed Atta was until May 2000 under surveillance of CIA. ... The German authorities were not informed. The American secret service obviously concealed to their German partners services another very important detail about Atta's dark pre-life: 15 years ago, Newsweek now reveals and refers to CIA documents, Atta was suspected of being involved in a bombing attack on an Israeli bus. In winter 2000 the former Hamburg-University student probably spied upon a navy base in Norfolk/Virginia. Despite that, Atta was left alone, he remained untouched. He was even cleared by the 'Bundeskriminalamt' (German FBI) as the Bureau's documents state." --Focus 39/2001, S. 20.

Was the attack of 911 unknown to CIA and Mossad?

The suspicion that intelligence services might have directed the 911 attack are fed by the German judiciary that considers 911 a "historical fact", exempted from the necessity to be proven by forensic evidence. This procedure reminds many people of mass gassings of Jews in "Krema II" of Auschwitz, also considered by the German judiciary as a "historical fact" . The story of six million gassed Jews provided Jewry the argument for the need of a Jewish state. The rest is history. 911 provided USrael the pretext to snatch world dominance through military enforcement. Horst Mahler's motion to take evidence that the WTC-towers collapsed by detonations inside the buildings, because explosive devices were planted inside the towers, was rejected by the district court in Mainz. The court held that such a motion was "denying historical facts".

"Court rejects Mahler's conspiracy theory. Horst Mahler, lawyer of the NPD (German Nationalist Party), stood trial before the district court in Mainz on Friday, appealing the initial sentence for his opinion on 911. The court now rejected Mahler's motion of taking evidence. The 67 year old lawyer intented to prove that the WTC did not allegedly collapse by the impact of the jet planes alone, but by professional blasting, instructed by the American government. Mahler, by taking such a motion, denies historical facts, the judge reasoned in his denial of the evidence presented." --Die Welt, Mar 1, 2003, p. 2.

Albuquerque Journal

(New Mexico, USA)

September 11, 2001

http://www.abqjournal.com/aqvan09-11-01.htm

Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says

By Olivier Uyttebrouck
Journal Staff Writer

"The collapse of the buildings ap-pears "too methodical" to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures."

Televised images of the attacks on the World Trade Center suggest that explosives devices caused the collapse of both towers, a New Mexico Tech explosion expert said Tuesday.

The collapse of the buildings appears "too methodical" to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures, said Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.

"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said.

Romero is a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures.

Romero said he based his opinion on video aired on national television broadcasts.

Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures.

"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that," Romero said in a phone interview from Washington, D.C.

Romero said he and another Tech administrator were on a Washington-area subway when an airplane struck the Pentagon.

He said he and Denny Peterson, vice president for administration and finance, were en route to an office building near the Pentagon to discuss defense-funded research programs at Tech.

If explosions did cause the towers to collapse, the detonations could have been caused by a small amount of explosive, he said.

"It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points," Romero said. The explosives likely would have been put in more than two points in each of the towers, he said.

The detonation of bombs within the towers is consistent with a common terrorist strategy, Romero said.

"One of the things terrorist events are noted for is a diversionary attack and secondary device," Romero said.

Attackers detonate an initial, diversionary explosion that attracts emergency personnel to the scene, then detonate a second explosion, he said.

Romero said that if his scenario is correct, the diversionary attack would have been the collision of the planes into the towers.

Tech President Dan Lopez said Tuesday that Tech had not been asked to take part in the investigation into the attacks. Tech often assists in forensic investigations into terrorist attacks, often by setting off similar explosions and studying the effects.