Amalek Iraq: The hate against an age old Aryan culture
USrael's barbaric warfare against the culture of mankind

"For Iraq, this is Year Zero; with the destruction of the antiquities in the Museum of Archaeology on Saturday and the burning of the National Archives and then the Koranic library, the cultural identity of Iraq is being erased. Why? Who set these fires? For what insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed?"

The entire world not only witnessed USraels horrific war crimes in the second Iraq-War, but watched in shock (not in awe) one of the most heinous crimes against world culture. When the American vandals invaded Baghdad, the plans, prepared well in advance, for the looting and the eradication of the Mesopotamian cultural heritage was implemented without hesitation. 170.000 priceless artefacts were stolen and the archives of thousands of years of history were burned to ashes, driven by an agenda of hate.

Neil Brody is head of the Illicit Antiquities Research Centre at Cambridge University. believes the raid on the Iraqi National Museum was planned well in advance, probably before the war had even started. ... The robbers knew where to look. They knew who had the key to the basement, where the good stuff was kept. ... Shortly before the invasion of Iraq, and with the spoils of war on their mind, some of these people formed themselves into a lobbying organisation called the American Council for Cultural Policy (ACCP). ‘Goddam sand-niggers want to retain all their history!’ ... So, here’s what seems to be the deal. A very short while ago an organisation was formed in the USA representing people who enjoy a lucrative or aesthetically rewarding trade in stolen historical artefacts, as well as artefacts traded legally and above board on the open market. The organisation was formed in some haste precisely because of the forthcoming war in Iraq. ... And this organisation had the power to demand a meeting at defense department and even presidential level. [ACCP is a Jewish organisation. The treasurer of the group is one William Pearlstein]

The Spectator, London, 19 April 2003

For avaricious American capitalism it was Iraq's resources which were to be brought under their control by this war. But America's neo-conservatives (an American code word for power-Jews) and for Israel the war against Iraq was not merely waged for financial spoils but for decisive Cabbalistic reasons.

Baghdad was the home of Marduk, the implacable adversary of Jaweh, and ancient Mesopotamia (now Iraq) was ruled by the Assyrians (Aryans, Marduk's forces) 2000 years BC. Saddam Hussein, who not only protected the cultural heritage of Marduk and Mesopotamia, but who also knew about the Jewish laws, had attracted in early stages of his presidency Israel's hate. Saddam became the Amalek (archenemy of the Jews) when he fired 39 Scud-Missiles on Israel (without any military effect) during USrael's first Iraq-War. It was the first time that Israel was hit by enemy rockets. A horrifying scenario for Jews because they believed, Jaweh would never allow Israel to be touched by its foes. Saddam's rocket attack on Israel and his in-depth knowledge of the Jewish laws made him Amalek.

"Talmudic ruling: 'it is forbidden to multiply the seed of Amalek' ... Amalekites, meaning that one is permitted to murder (sic) them until their remembrance is blotted out from under heaven." (Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, Pluto Press, London 1994, p. 77, 84)

The extermination of Amalekites does not stop with their physical destruction, but only ends when "their remembrance is blotted out from under heaven". If a people is stripped of its cultural heritage (remembrance), it is left without roots. A people, whose cultural identity has been blotted out, doesn't exist anymore as a people, reads the definition of a successful war against Amalekites: "For Iraq, this is Year Zero; with the destruction of the antiquities in the Museum of Archaeology on Saturday and the burning of the National Archives and then the Koranic library, the cultural identity of Iraq is being erased. Why? Who set these fires? For what insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed?" --Die Welt,16.4.2003, S. 27.

Blotting out the remembrance of ancient Mesopotamia by burning down the archives of Baghdad, which held unique ancient scriptures, wasn't the work of looters. Criminals are only interested in goods, they are not interested in burning ancient scriptures. The occupying forces watched the destruction of these unique cultural treasures without participation. Since Americans have no culture of their own, they had little feeling when the most important antiquities in the history of civilisation were destroyed, which made the American invaders an ideal guarding force of this gigantic cultural crime: "Distraught Iraqi curators said they alone were guarding the shattered fragments of their collections and had resolved to stay because American forces were still unwilling to stand guard outside the National Museum in Baghdad despite international condemnation of the looting." --The Independent, 16 April 2003, p.

Those, who employed America's forces with their weapons of mass destruction, are suspected to be the masterminds of the most horrific crime against human culture in the history of mankind.

"They lie across the floor in tens of thousands of pieces, the priceless antiquities of Iraq's history. The looters had gone from shelf to shelf, systematically pulling down the statues and pots and amphorae of the Assyrians and the Babylonians, the Sumerians, the Medes, the Persians and the Greeks and hurling them on to the concrete. ...

"Our feet crunched on the wreckage of 5,000-year-old marble plinths and stone statuary and pots that had endured every siege of Baghdad, every invasion of Iraq throughout history ­ only to be destroyed when America came to 'liberate' the city.  physically destroying the evidence of their own nation's thousands of years of civilisation. ...

"When I shone my torch over one far shelf, I drew in my breath. Every pot and jar ­ '3,500 BC' it said on one shelf corner ­ had been bashed to pieces. Why? How could they do this? Why, when the city was already burning, when anarchy had been let loose ­ and less than three months after US archaeologists and Pentagon officials met to discuss the country's treasures and put the Baghdad Archaeological Museum on a military data-base ­ did the Americans allow the mobs to destroy the priceless heritage of ancient Mesopotamia? And all this happened while US Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld, was sneering at the press for claiming that anarchy had broken out in Baghdad. ...

"A glass case that had once held 40,000-year-old stone and flint objects had been smashed open. It lay empty. No one knows what happened to the Assyrian reliefs from the royal palace of Khorsabad, nor the 5,000-year-old seals nor the 4,500-year-old gold leaf earrings once buried with Sumerian princesses. ...

"Half an hour later, I contacted the civil affairs unit of the US Marines in Saadun Street and gave them the exact location of the museum and the condition of its contents. A captain told me that 'we're probably going to get down there'. Too late. Iraq's history had already been trashed by the looters whom the Americans unleashed on the city during their 'liberation'." --Robert Fisk, The Independent, 13 April 2003, p. 1.

"'Almost twenty centuries of written history of mankind are imperiled', said Director General Koïchiro Matsuura. Scriptures of the National Archives  and the Koran Library had already fallen victims to the flames. ... 170.000 cultural artefacts and scriptures have been stolen or destroyed, according to the 'London Times'. The 'Times' refers to a Unesco representative in Jordan. 'This is a catastrophe to the cultural heritage of Iraq', said Neil MacGregor, Director of the British Museums." --Die Welt, 16 April 2003, p. 27.

"Many columnists of the Arab media perceive Israel's influence as a menace to the region. The publisher of the Lebanese newspaper 'as-Safir' wrote: 'America's first excursion is nearly over. In this open war, a new aim came to the surface which turns out, bit by bit. to be a Israeli aim. It lets the Arab nations feel that they are holding the position as an enemy.' The paper quotes in an other article a Lebanese politician, who referred to a 'Zionist clique' that 'rules America'. Also the looting of Iraq's cultural wealth was organised by Israel, a columnist of the Jordanian newspaper 'al-Dustour' claims. 'In the thirties it took only a few months until the European and American Museums bought our looted cultural assets. And now, history repeats itself, but in much more repulsive way, because this time the great museums of the Capital Baghdad have been looted. We are witnessing not merely theft of cultural possessions, but a spiteful Jewish attempt, to blot out our wealth and our culture'." --Spiegel online, 14 April 2003.

If the extermination of Amalek (blotting out the remembrance of an adversary or a adversarial people) coincides with a multi-billion profit, it can be then considered as an ideal case of destroying Amalek:

"Whilst larger museums and certainly important archaeological excavation sites in Iraq are looted due to the present chaotic situation, the criminal underground is already preparing to smuggle thousands of artefacts into the international art market. Probably the main route used will lead via Jordan to Israel. And from Israel to Switzerland, from where the material will be distributed to New York, London, Paris and Tokyo. On these routes the evidence of origin will disappear. ... The inflow of additional Iraqi antiques into the international art market could accumulate to several billion of British Pounds and the profits thereof will fill the pockets of slippery traders and the organised crime in Europe and North America." --Die Welt, 15 April 2003, p. 28.