Prof. Dr. Robert Faurisson

By Dr. Robert Faurisson

If ever Americans and British do not find evidence of Saddam's "Weapons of Mass Destruction" or of Saddam's (six ?) doubles (in French : sosies), this will be the best possible evidence that those WMDs and those doubles really existed.

Remember the witchcraft trials, the Nazi war criminals trials or the Revisionists trials.

In the past centuries (especially from 1450 to 1650), according to some experts, there were allegedly sixty possible traces on the body of a witch that she had intercourse with Satan but, finally, it seems it was decided, in spite of descriptions made by those naive experts, that the best possible evidence of such an intercourse was that Satan had erased every trace; otherwise he would not have been Satan.

In the last century (especially from 1945), the same thing happened with the Nazi gas chambers and with the witnesses of the gassings of the Jews. There was alledgedly a lot of evidence and testimonies but, finally, it seems it was decided, in spite of demonstrations made by naive experts, that the best possible evidence was that Hitler had ordered the destruction of all those chemical slaughterhouses and the killing of all the witnesses; otherwise he would not have been Hitler. As Simone Veil already put it in 1983 : "Everyone knows that the Nazis destroyed those gas chambers and systematically eliminated the witnesses" (France-Soir Magazine, 7 May 1983, p.47).

At the beginning of this very century (especially from 2002), it seems we'll have the same scenario with Saddam's WMDs, and his doubles.

If that is the case, the lies (and the liars ?) should be the same, and Revisionism of WW 3 praticed by Revisionists of WW 2 should be an easy job.

How the good-doers justify crimes against humanity